<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 407 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158950</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the estimated suppressed turnover, penalty for wilful suppression, and additions based on discrepancies in C.R. sheet stock, finding them justified based on the evidence and assessments presented. The total turnover and additions were deemed reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the tax case revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 407 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158950</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the estimated suppressed turnover, penalty for wilful suppression, and additions based on discrepancies in C.R. sheet stock, finding them justified based on the evidence and assessments presented. The total turnover and additions were deemed reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the tax case revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>