<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 512 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the defects identified in the accounts of the hotel business were not substantial enough to warrant rejection, given the unique challenges of the industry. The court overturned the decisions of the assessing officer, the first appellate authority, and the appellate Tribunal, instructing the assessing authority to accept the accounts as presented for assessment purposes. The petition was granted in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:16:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 512 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the defects identified in the accounts of the hotel business were not substantial enough to warrant rejection, given the unique challenges of the industry. The court overturned the decisions of the assessing officer, the first appellate authority, and the appellate Tribunal, instructing the assessing authority to accept the accounts as presented for assessment purposes. The petition was granted in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>