<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 512 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</link>
    <description>In a hotel business, accounts should not be rejected for best judgment estimation unless the defects are substantial and materially impair reliability. The Kerala High Court noted that rigid insistence on stock inventory, supporting purchase bills and similar records may be impractical in a vegetarian hotel where goods are perishable and purchases are made daily. On the facts, the materials relied on by the assessing and appellate authorities did not disclose intrinsic defects sufficient to discard the accounts, and the alleged excess stock and employee-based inference lacked adequate foundation. The rejection of accounts and consequential turnover estimate were therefore found unjustified, and the assessment was set aside with directions to accept the accounts and complete the assessment accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:16:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 512 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</link>
      <description>In a hotel business, accounts should not be rejected for best judgment estimation unless the defects are substantial and materially impair reliability. The Kerala High Court noted that rigid insistence on stock inventory, supporting purchase bills and similar records may be impractical in a vegetarian hotel where goods are perishable and purchases are made daily. On the facts, the materials relied on by the assessing and appellate authorities did not disclose intrinsic defects sufficient to discard the accounts, and the alleged excess stock and employee-based inference lacked adequate foundation. The rejection of accounts and consequential turnover estimate were therefore found unjustified, and the assessment was set aside with directions to accept the accounts and complete the assessment accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>