<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 360 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158939</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed without jurisdiction, and the appellant-assessee lacked the right to invoke revisional powers under Section 20 of the Act. The principle of res judicata was found inapplicable, emphasizing that jurisdictional errors cannot be rectified by procedural doctrines. The Court clarified that the Commissioner&#039;s order was non est, leading to the dismissal of the Special Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 360 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158939</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed without jurisdiction, and the appellant-assessee lacked the right to invoke revisional powers under Section 20 of the Act. The principle of res judicata was found inapplicable, emphasizing that jurisdictional errors cannot be rectified by procedural doctrines. The Court clarified that the Commissioner&#039;s order was non est, leading to the dismissal of the Special Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>