<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158938</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging a notice issued under section 30C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, emphasizing the importance of factual considerations in determining the application of extraordinary powers under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The seizure of goods and vehicle was upheld based on the officer&#039;s reasonable belief of smuggling activity, supported by evidence found during inspection. The court highlighted the self-contained procedure in section 30C and the discretion to release goods and vehicles under section 29A, ultimately denying release in this case due to the specific facts and provisions for confiscation under section 30C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158938</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging a notice issued under section 30C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, emphasizing the importance of factual considerations in determining the application of extraordinary powers under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The seizure of goods and vehicle was upheld based on the officer&#039;s reasonable belief of smuggling activity, supported by evidence found during inspection. The court highlighted the self-contained procedure in section 30C and the discretion to release goods and vehicles under section 29A, ultimately denying release in this case due to the specific facts and provisions for confiscation under section 30C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>