<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158935</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court interpreted the amendment to section 32 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, focusing on the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers post-amendment. The court emphasized the restriction imposed on the assessee&#039;s ability to compel the Deputy Commissioner to revise assessments. It clarified that the amendment operated prospectively from November 1, 1982, limiting the assessee&#039;s authority to request revisions post-amendment. Ultimately, the court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders, restoring the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decisions and allowing the revisions, ruling in favor of the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158935</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court interpreted the amendment to section 32 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, focusing on the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers post-amendment. The court emphasized the restriction imposed on the assessee&#039;s ability to compel the Deputy Commissioner to revise assessments. It clarified that the amendment operated prospectively from November 1, 1982, limiting the assessee&#039;s authority to request revisions post-amendment. Ultimately, the court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders, restoring the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decisions and allowing the revisions, ruling in favor of the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>