https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158931 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner did not meet the investment threshold for the Deferment Scheme, 1987, had opportunities to opt for the Deferment Scheme, 1989, and was not prejudiced by procedural lapses. The court held the writ petition was maintainable as there were no alternative remedies available at the time of filing. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:29:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158931 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner did not meet the investment threshold for the Deferment Scheme, 1987, had opportunities to opt for the Deferment Scheme, 1989, and was not prejudiced by procedural lapses. The court held the writ petition was maintainable as there were no alternative remedies available at the time of filing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 14 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158931