<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 414 - ORISSA HIGH COURT]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158926</link>
    <description>The High Court of Orissa addressed the challenge to the legality of a penalty imposition under section 13(5) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of penalty imposition, the need for objective determination, and the requirement to provide reasons to prevent arbitrariness. The Court directed the matter back to the Sales Tax Officer for reconsideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s order, ultimately disposing of the writ application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 414 - ORISSA HIGH COURT]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158926</link>
      <description>The High Court of Orissa addressed the challenge to the legality of a penalty imposition under section 13(5) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of penalty imposition, the need for objective determination, and the requirement to provide reasons to prevent arbitrariness. The Court directed the matter back to the Sales Tax Officer for reconsideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s order, ultimately disposing of the writ application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>