<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239332</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Wockhardt Ltd., a pharmaceutical manufacturer, in an appeal against the denial of credit for testing and analyzing services for a product yet to be manufactured. The Tribunal held that such services qualify as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, citing legal precedents. It was determined that the distribution of credit from the head office to a different unit was permissible under Rule 7 of the Rules. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a stay, waiving the pre-deposit of dues and staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239332</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Wockhardt Ltd., a pharmaceutical manufacturer, in an appeal against the denial of credit for testing and analyzing services for a product yet to be manufactured. The Tribunal held that such services qualify as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, citing legal precedents. It was determined that the distribution of credit from the head office to a different unit was permissible under Rule 7 of the Rules. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a stay, waiving the pre-deposit of dues and staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>