<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 508 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239331</link>
    <description>The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, alongside the penalty under Section 78, for the period before 10/05/2008. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalty under Section 76 is not attracted once penalty under Section 78 is imposed was rejected. The CESTAT ruled that penalties under both sections could be imposed separately, even for offenses committed in the same transaction, based on the interpretation of law and judicial discipline. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 508 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239331</link>
      <description>The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, alongside the penalty under Section 78, for the period before 10/05/2008. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalty under Section 76 is not attracted once penalty under Section 78 is imposed was rejected. The CESTAT ruled that penalties under both sections could be imposed separately, even for offenses committed in the same transaction, based on the interpretation of law and judicial discipline. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>