<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 502 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.8,00,000/- within 8 weeks due to insufficient supporting documents. The pre-deposit could be reduced if the Applicant verified that the payment of Rs.3,39,306/- related to the confirmed demand. The Revenue was instructed to verify the purpose of the payment for compliance. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper documentation and verification in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 502 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.8,00,000/- within 8 weeks due to insufficient supporting documents. The pre-deposit could be reduced if the Applicant verified that the payment of Rs.3,39,306/- related to the confirmed demand. The Revenue was instructed to verify the purpose of the payment for compliance. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper documentation and verification in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>