<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239318</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the order directing the appellants to pay Rs. 2,42,500/- after deducting penalty and fine amounts. The Court found that the gold was sold before the respondent could redeem it, rendering the customs duty deduction irrelevant. Referring to legal precedents, the Court emphasized duty payment applies upon redemption, not when sale proceeds are involved. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239318</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the order directing the appellants to pay Rs. 2,42,500/- after deducting penalty and fine amounts. The Court found that the gold was sold before the respondent could redeem it, rendering the customs duty deduction irrelevant. Referring to legal precedents, the Court emphasized duty payment applies upon redemption, not when sale proceeds are involved. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>