<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition by the Assessing Officer under Section 47(xiv), ruling in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D, as the assessee did not adequately prove the absence of expenses related to exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Cross Objection by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition by the Assessing Officer under Section 47(xiv), ruling in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D, as the assessee did not adequately prove the absence of expenses related to exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Cross Objection by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>