<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the reconciliation of stock discrepancies and the explanation for excess stock. The disallowance related to provident fund contributions was deleted based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, holding the amendment to section 43-B as retrospective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the reconciliation of stock discrepancies and the explanation for excess stock. The disallowance related to provident fund contributions was deleted based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, holding the amendment to section 43-B as retrospective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>