<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239287</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed in debatable issues where full disclosures are made. The ITAT&#039;s ruling aligns with Supreme Court principles, ensuring penalties are imposed judiciously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239287</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed in debatable issues where full disclosures are made. The ITAT&#039;s ruling aligns with Supreme Court principles, ensuring penalties are imposed judiciously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>