<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158898</link>
    <description>Registration under the Societies Registration Act does not by itself create incorporation, so a registered society may remain an unincorporated association for sales tax purposes. After the Forty-sixth Amendment, supply of goods by an unincorporated association to its members for valuable consideration falls within the expanded concept of sale and is taxable where the statute so provides. A claimed contrary administrative letter cannot defeat the correct levy, because Article 14 does not require repetition of an unlawful tax benefit granted to others. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to taxability therefore failed, and the tax position was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158898</link>
      <description>Registration under the Societies Registration Act does not by itself create incorporation, so a registered society may remain an unincorporated association for sales tax purposes. After the Forty-sixth Amendment, supply of goods by an unincorporated association to its members for valuable consideration falls within the expanded concept of sale and is taxable where the statute so provides. A claimed contrary administrative letter cannot defeat the correct levy, because Article 14 does not require repetition of an unlawful tax benefit granted to others. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to taxability therefore failed, and the tax position was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>