<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 527 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158896</link>
    <description>A dealer&#039;s accounts may be rejected and best judgment assessment sustained where a pre-assessment notice under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is served, but no objection or explanation is filed to cure defects in the return. Non-production of original delivery notes, absence of a satisfactory explanation for their loss or destruction, and failure to maintain the prescribed register justified an inference of misuse for unaccounted transport, so the related addition was upheld. The further addition based on detected instances of suppression and unaccounted transport was also supported by material and sustained. The assessment restored by the Tribunal was therefore affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 527 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158896</link>
      <description>A dealer&#039;s accounts may be rejected and best judgment assessment sustained where a pre-assessment notice under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is served, but no objection or explanation is filed to cure defects in the return. Non-production of original delivery notes, absence of a satisfactory explanation for their loss or destruction, and failure to maintain the prescribed register justified an inference of misuse for unaccounted transport, so the related addition was upheld. The further addition based on detected instances of suppression and unaccounted transport was also supported by material and sustained. The assessment restored by the Tribunal was therefore affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>