<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158886</link>
    <description>Under self-assessment under section 13(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, tax on disclosed works contract turnover became due on the statutory date, and unpaid tax attracted automatic interest under section 24(3) without any separate demand or provisional assessment. Revised returns filed after the due date did not wipe out the earlier default, and interim orders obtained in related litigation did not extinguish the statutory consequence of delayed payment. The retrospective insertion of section 3-B confirmed the taxability of works contract turnover from the retrospective date. The impugned orders sustaining interest liability were therefore maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158886</link>
      <description>Under self-assessment under section 13(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, tax on disclosed works contract turnover became due on the statutory date, and unpaid tax attracted automatic interest under section 24(3) without any separate demand or provisional assessment. Revised returns filed after the due date did not wipe out the earlier default, and interim orders obtained in related litigation did not extinguish the statutory consequence of delayed payment. The retrospective insertion of section 3-B confirmed the taxability of works contract turnover from the retrospective date. The impugned orders sustaining interest liability were therefore maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>