<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 461 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239284</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings and consequential revenue recovery under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act were set aside because the assessing authority&#039;s approach was found unsatisfactory and the matter required reconsideration. The Court accepted that the petitioner had raised a challenge to liability and jurisdiction, but left the tax liability issue open for fresh adjudication. The order was remitted for a fresh enquiry and decision in accordance with law, with directions that the petitioner be given an opportunity of hearing and, on request, supplied with the documents relied upon. The operative principle was that, where proper reconsideration of the materials is needed, remand is the appropriate course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 461 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239284</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings and consequential revenue recovery under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act were set aside because the assessing authority&#039;s approach was found unsatisfactory and the matter required reconsideration. The Court accepted that the petitioner had raised a challenge to liability and jurisdiction, but left the tax liability issue open for fresh adjudication. The order was remitted for a fresh enquiry and decision in accordance with law, with directions that the petitioner be given an opportunity of hearing and, on request, supplied with the documents relied upon. The operative principle was that, where proper reconsideration of the materials is needed, remand is the appropriate course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>