<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 443 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.1 lakh within eight weeks for a penalty imposed under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, related to High Sea Sale and diversion of goods. Further orders and recovery of the balance amount were stayed pending compliance verification. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed scrutiny due to the appellant&#039;s alleged awareness of the goods&#039; diversion, reflecting a conditional approach to the case. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough examination in customs violation cases, ensuring procedural fairness and transparency in penalty imposition and waiver considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 443 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.1 lakh within eight weeks for a penalty imposed under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, related to High Sea Sale and diversion of goods. Further orders and recovery of the balance amount were stayed pending compliance verification. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed scrutiny due to the appellant&#039;s alleged awareness of the goods&#039; diversion, reflecting a conditional approach to the case. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough examination in customs violation cases, ensuring procedural fairness and transparency in penalty imposition and waiver considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>