https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239261 The Tribunal confirmed a demand for duty of approximately Rs.2.69 Crores for April 2011 and imposed a penalty, while retaining the duty deposit made for March 2011. Despite objections from the Revenue, the Tribunal allowed the adjustment of the March deposit for April duty. Due to the technical nature of the issue and no financial loss to the Revenue, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the dues, granting the stay petition. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2015 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239261 The Tribunal confirmed a demand for duty of approximately Rs.2.69 Crores for April 2011 and imposed a penalty, while retaining the duty deposit made for March 2011. Despite objections from the Revenue, the Tribunal allowed the adjustment of the March deposit for April duty. Due to the technical nature of the issue and no financial loss to the Revenue, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the dues, granting the stay petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239261