<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 437 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty and imposed penalties amounting to Rs.1,63,47,753 against M/s. Waryam Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. for clandestine removal of goods. Additional penalties were imposed on related parties. Ownership of weighment slips crucial in determining movement of goods was attributed to M/s. Waryam Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. despite their claim of internal use. The Tribunal proceeded with the case evaluation based on available information despite document supply issues. Recipients admitting receipt of goods were directed to deposit penalties. The judgment emphasized evidence, document disclosure, and accountability for fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 437 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty and imposed penalties amounting to Rs.1,63,47,753 against M/s. Waryam Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. for clandestine removal of goods. Additional penalties were imposed on related parties. Ownership of weighment slips crucial in determining movement of goods was attributed to M/s. Waryam Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. despite their claim of internal use. The Tribunal proceeded with the case evaluation based on available information despite document supply issues. Recipients admitting receipt of goods were directed to deposit penalties. The judgment emphasized evidence, document disclosure, and accountability for fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>