<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that the lump sum trading addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- lacked valid justification and calculation. The Tribunal found discrepancies in invoking Section 145(3) and additions under Section 40A(3) were not sustainable. The order was set aside, remitting certain issues for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that the lump sum trading addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- lacked valid justification and calculation. The Tribunal found discrepancies in invoking Section 145(3) and additions under Section 40A(3) were not sustainable. The order was set aside, remitting certain issues for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>