<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all disputed issues. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a proper basis for disallowances and recognized the business practices and accounting methods consistently followed by the assessee. The judgment reinforced the importance of recognizing income based on actual execution of services and the necessity of substantiating disallowances with concrete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all disputed issues. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a proper basis for disallowances and recognized the business practices and accounting methods consistently followed by the assessee. The judgment reinforced the importance of recognizing income based on actual execution of services and the necessity of substantiating disallowances with concrete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>