<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal restored the issue of Rs. 225 crores deduction to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, allowed the proportionate deduction of Rs. 8,20,25,000 for stock-in-trade, and accepted the revenue sharing basis for rental income, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals). The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal restored the issue of Rs. 225 crores deduction to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, allowed the proportionate deduction of Rs. 8,20,25,000 for stock-in-trade, and accepted the revenue sharing basis for rental income, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals). The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>