<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239231</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly decided in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of proportionate interest expenditure, directing the AO to recalculate the interest disallowance based on the investment made during the year only. However, the tribunal upheld the disallowance of the mark-to-market loss on outstanding forward contracts, considering them speculative transactions. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with the tribunal&#039;s decision announced on 3.5.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239231</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly decided in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of proportionate interest expenditure, directing the AO to recalculate the interest disallowance based on the investment made during the year only. However, the tribunal upheld the disallowance of the mark-to-market loss on outstanding forward contracts, considering them speculative transactions. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with the tribunal&#039;s decision announced on 3.5.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>