<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 994 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158864</link>
    <description>The appeal against the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) licence was dismissed. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to revoke the licence due to serious violations of CHALR was upheld. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the revocation as excessive and based on incorrect charges, including unauthorized transfer/sale of the licence, were rejected. Despite acknowledging delays in proceedings, the Tribunal found the violations serious and justified the revocation. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing that the operative order would be relevant if the earlier revocation was set aside by an appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 994 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158864</link>
      <description>The appeal against the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) licence was dismissed. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to revoke the licence due to serious violations of CHALR was upheld. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the revocation as excessive and based on incorrect charges, including unauthorized transfer/sale of the licence, were rejected. Despite acknowledging delays in proceedings, the Tribunal found the violations serious and justified the revocation. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing that the operative order would be relevant if the earlier revocation was set aside by an appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>