<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 434 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158860</link>
    <description>A contract for manufacturing and supplying PCC blocks was treated as a works contract rather than a contract of sale because the department supplied cement, water and land free of cost, retained ownership in the supplied materials, and the contractor never acquired ownership in the raw materials or finished blocks. The contractor&#039;s own material component was found to remain below the exemption threshold prescribed by the relevant notification under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, supporting non-taxability as a sale. The comparison with an earlier similar contract was accepted, while a cited case was distinguished on the ground that the contractor there owned the raw materials and finished goods. On that basis, the assessment order and show-cause notice were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 434 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158860</link>
      <description>A contract for manufacturing and supplying PCC blocks was treated as a works contract rather than a contract of sale because the department supplied cement, water and land free of cost, retained ownership in the supplied materials, and the contractor never acquired ownership in the raw materials or finished blocks. The contractor&#039;s own material component was found to remain below the exemption threshold prescribed by the relevant notification under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, supporting non-taxability as a sale. The comparison with an earlier similar contract was accepted, while a cited case was distinguished on the ground that the contractor there owned the raw materials and finished goods. On that basis, the assessment order and show-cause notice were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>