<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 445 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158850</link>
    <description>An exemption from State sales tax on footwear was held not to be a general exemption because it applied only subject to value limits and specified manufacturing or marketing conditions; inter-State sales therefore did not qualify for exemption under section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Interest on the tax demand was treated as accruing by operation of law from the date tax became payable under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, and the later clarification of liability did not defer that statutory obligation. Time was nevertheless allowed to file form C declarations, enabling the concessional rate under section 8(1) and consequential recalculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 445 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158850</link>
      <description>An exemption from State sales tax on footwear was held not to be a general exemption because it applied only subject to value limits and specified manufacturing or marketing conditions; inter-State sales therefore did not qualify for exemption under section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Interest on the tax demand was treated as accruing by operation of law from the date tax became payable under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, and the later clarification of liability did not defer that statutory obligation. Time was nevertheless allowed to file form C declarations, enabling the concessional rate under section 8(1) and consequential recalculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>