<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interior Decorator Services Tax Dispute: Disagreement on Limitation Period and Penalties, Referred to Larger Bench for Resolution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15651</link>
    <description>Interior Decorator Service - On the issue of classification and taxability, both the members are in agreement - decided against the assessee. - But on the issue of raising demand invoking extended period of limitation and levy of penalty, there is no consent, referred to larger bench - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:41:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interior Decorator Services Tax Dispute: Disagreement on Limitation Period and Penalties, Referred to Larger Bench for Resolution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15651</link>
      <description>Interior Decorator Service - On the issue of classification and taxability, both the members are in agreement - decided against the assessee. - But on the issue of raising demand invoking extended period of limitation and levy of penalty, there is no consent, referred to larger bench - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:41:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>