<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Cannot Increase AO&#039;s Disallowance Beyond 20% on Bogus Purchases; Revenue&#039;s Full Disallowance Claim Rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15637</link>
    <description>Additions on account of bogus purchases - accommodation bills - AO only restricted to 20% of purchases claimed, it is surprising that the revenue now contends that the entire amount is disallowable. When Assessing Officer did not make disallowance of entire amount, ITAT can not improve upon the order of Assessing Officer - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:45:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Cannot Increase AO&#039;s Disallowance Beyond 20% on Bogus Purchases; Revenue&#039;s Full Disallowance Claim Rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15637</link>
      <description>Additions on account of bogus purchases - accommodation bills - AO only restricted to 20% of purchases claimed, it is surprising that the revenue now contends that the entire amount is disallowable. When Assessing Officer did not make disallowance of entire amount, ITAT can not improve upon the order of Assessing Officer - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:45:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>