https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158843 The court partially quashed the Central Information Commission's order, directing immediate supply of information under the RTI Act. It found withholding information until tax recovery complete illogical, emphasizing access to information as a rule. The court held that mere existence of an investigation process cannot justify refusal of information without satisfactory reasons. While noting a delay in compliance, it did not impose penalties under Section 20 of the RTI Act due to lack of demonstrated mala fide intent. The writ petition was allowed, directing release of information within two weeks. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158843 The court partially quashed the Central Information Commission's order, directing immediate supply of information under the RTI Act. It found withholding information until tax recovery complete illogical, emphasizing access to information as a rule. The court held that mere existence of an investigation process cannot justify refusal of information without satisfactory reasons. While noting a delay in compliance, it did not impose penalties under Section 20 of the RTI Act due to lack of demonstrated mala fide intent. The writ petition was allowed, directing release of information within two weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158843