<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 534 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158842</link>
    <description>The court found that the partnership formed for arrack blending was illegal under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act as it aimed to exploit a non-transferable license. The court ruled that an illegal partnership could be taxed under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act based on precedents. Regarding the liability of a minor in a partnership for tax dues, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim of being a minor during the assessment year, branding him a &quot;classic liar.&quot; The court dismissed the writ petition, holding the petitioners liable for tax dues and ordering costs to be paid to the first respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 534 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158842</link>
      <description>The court found that the partnership formed for arrack blending was illegal under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act as it aimed to exploit a non-transferable license. The court ruled that an illegal partnership could be taxed under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act based on precedents. Regarding the liability of a minor in a partnership for tax dues, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim of being a minor during the assessment year, branding him a &quot;classic liar.&quot; The court dismissed the writ petition, holding the petitioners liable for tax dues and ordering costs to be paid to the first respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>