<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 396 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239219</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI addressed the disallowance of CENVAT credit on iron and steel products used in construction under Works Contract Service. The Tribunal acknowledged the use of materials in construction but decided to further examine the eligibility of iron and steel articles for credit based on a Supreme Court decision. It also scrutinized the applicability of Notification No.32/07-ST to the service provider or recipient, ultimately granting a stay on the recovery of the balance amount of duty, interest, and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal found the payment made by the applicant sufficient for waiving the predeposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 396 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239219</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI addressed the disallowance of CENVAT credit on iron and steel products used in construction under Works Contract Service. The Tribunal acknowledged the use of materials in construction but decided to further examine the eligibility of iron and steel articles for credit based on a Supreme Court decision. It also scrutinized the applicability of Notification No.32/07-ST to the service provider or recipient, ultimately granting a stay on the recovery of the balance amount of duty, interest, and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal found the payment made by the applicant sufficient for waiving the predeposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>