<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 392 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning customs duty on imported LPG. It was determined that the Revenue should have invoked Section 72 of the Customs Act instead of Section 28 for duty recovery. Despite discrepancies in duty payment, the Tribunal emphasized the need for correct legal provisions application and aligned interpretations with case-specific circumstances for fair outcomes in customs duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 392 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning customs duty on imported LPG. It was determined that the Revenue should have invoked Section 72 of the Customs Act instead of Section 28 for duty recovery. Despite discrepancies in duty payment, the Tribunal emphasized the need for correct legal provisions application and aligned interpretations with case-specific circumstances for fair outcomes in customs duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>