<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 377 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239200</link>
    <description>The government allowed the rebate claim under the DEEC Scheme despite procedural violations, ruling in favor of the applicant. The decision emphasized the admissibility of the claim based on the payment of duty and export of goods, overriding minor procedural lapses. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, directing the original authority to sanction the rebate if the claim was otherwise in order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 377 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239200</link>
      <description>The government allowed the rebate claim under the DEEC Scheme despite procedural violations, ruling in favor of the applicant. The decision emphasized the admissibility of the claim based on the payment of duty and export of goods, overriding minor procedural lapses. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, directing the original authority to sanction the rebate if the claim was otherwise in order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>