<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to adopt a 25% net profit rate on the total turnover, finding the assessee&#039;s declared profit too low and the AO&#039;s estimation too high. The Tribunal supported the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning based on seized materials and lack of proper accounts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the net profit rate was dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the balanced approach taken by the CIT (A). The issue of interest levied under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was acknowledged by the assessee, who was advised to rectify computation errors. Both appeals were dismissed, and the order was issued on 30th August 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to adopt a 25% net profit rate on the total turnover, finding the assessee&#039;s declared profit too low and the AO&#039;s estimation too high. The Tribunal supported the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning based on seized materials and lack of proper accounts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the net profit rate was dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the balanced approach taken by the CIT (A). The issue of interest levied under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was acknowledged by the assessee, who was advised to rectify computation errors. Both appeals were dismissed, and the order was issued on 30th August 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>