<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158825</link>
    <description>Where an assessment order had already been set aside and the matter remitted for fresh assessment, the Court modified the ancillary security condition from a monetary deposit to a personal bond, while preserving the assessee&#039;s liability and the direction for production of supporting documents. It also noted that the appellate scheme required a 25% pre-deposit to entertain an appeal but contained no waiver or stay mechanism for genuine hardship cases. On that basis, the Court recommended legislative amendment to permit discretionary waiver or stay in appropriate cases, including under the second appellate provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158825</link>
      <description>Where an assessment order had already been set aside and the matter remitted for fresh assessment, the Court modified the ancillary security condition from a monetary deposit to a personal bond, while preserving the assessee&#039;s liability and the direction for production of supporting documents. It also noted that the appellate scheme required a 25% pre-deposit to entertain an appeal but contained no waiver or stay mechanism for genuine hardship cases. On that basis, the Court recommended legislative amendment to permit discretionary waiver or stay in appropriate cases, including under the second appellate provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>