<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 443 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158819</link>
    <description>Absorbent cotton wool I.P. was considered against Entry 2 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, which covered cotton in its unmanufactured state. The governing test was whether processing transformed the material into a new and distinct commodity with a different commercial identity; mere cleaning, ginning, drying, bleaching or sterilising did not amount to manufacture if the essential character of cotton remained unchanged. On that construction, processed absorbent cotton wool retained its identity as cotton and continued to fall within the entry. Rule 3(xviii) of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was read consistently with that approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:46:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 443 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158819</link>
      <description>Absorbent cotton wool I.P. was considered against Entry 2 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, which covered cotton in its unmanufactured state. The governing test was whether processing transformed the material into a new and distinct commodity with a different commercial identity; mere cleaning, ginning, drying, bleaching or sterilising did not amount to manufacture if the essential character of cotton remained unchanged. On that construction, processed absorbent cotton wool retained its identity as cotton and continued to fall within the entry. Rule 3(xviii) of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was read consistently with that approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>