<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 631 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158818</link>
    <description>An alternate statutory appeal ordinarily bars writ review against a revised sales tax assessment, and the writ petition was treated as not maintainable on that basis. On limitation, Section 16(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was applied by taking the date of the final assessment order as the starting point for reopening escaped turnover. Because the final assessment for the relevant year was made after the amendment took effect, the revised assessment issued later fell within the five-year period and was not time-barred. The contrary argument that the later final assessment date could not be relied on was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 631 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158818</link>
      <description>An alternate statutory appeal ordinarily bars writ review against a revised sales tax assessment, and the writ petition was treated as not maintainable on that basis. On limitation, Section 16(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was applied by taking the date of the final assessment order as the starting point for reopening escaped turnover. Because the final assessment for the relevant year was made after the amendment took effect, the revised assessment issued later fell within the five-year period and was not time-barred. The contrary argument that the later final assessment date could not be relied on was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>