<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 517 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158813</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 14(4-A) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act is not time-barred merely because the order is communicated after four years from service of the original assessment order. The statutory focus is on whether the reassessment order was made within the limitation period; prompt service is relevant only where delay is unexplained, inordinate, or suggests ante-dating. The cited precedents were read narrowly and did not create a general rule that late communication alone invalidates reassessment. On the stated facts, there was no unexplained delay or plea of ante-dating, so the limitation challenge fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 517 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158813</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 14(4-A) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act is not time-barred merely because the order is communicated after four years from service of the original assessment order. The statutory focus is on whether the reassessment order was made within the limitation period; prompt service is relevant only where delay is unexplained, inordinate, or suggests ante-dating. The cited precedents were read narrowly and did not create a general rule that late communication alone invalidates reassessment. On the stated facts, there was no unexplained delay or plea of ante-dating, so the limitation challenge fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>