<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 516 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158810</link>
    <description>A sales tax notification granting a lower rate for loose tea sold in bulk packages of 20 kilograms and above was analysed as a fiscal classification aimed at reducing the tax burden on lower and poorer consumers. The distinction between bulk loose tea and packet tea was found to have a rational nexus with that object, because goods sold in bulk and later retailed in smaller quantities could be taxed differently to achieve a legitimate fiscal and social purpose. The challenge based on Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 301 failed, and the classification was treated as valid rather than arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 516 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158810</link>
      <description>A sales tax notification granting a lower rate for loose tea sold in bulk packages of 20 kilograms and above was analysed as a fiscal classification aimed at reducing the tax burden on lower and poorer consumers. The distinction between bulk loose tea and packet tea was found to have a rational nexus with that object, because goods sold in bulk and later retailed in smaller quantities could be taxed differently to achieve a legitimate fiscal and social purpose. The challenge based on Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 301 failed, and the classification was treated as valid rather than arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>