<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 515 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158798</link>
    <description>Parts and accessories of tractors were held not exigible to entry tax under the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, 1979 because tax liability arises only for goods expressly included in the First Schedule. The entry for machinery and its parts and accessories could not be stretched to tractors, as tractors are agricultural machinery and fall outside that entry; the Second Schedule exemption for agricultural machinery confirmed that position. The court also rejected the revenue&#039;s attempt to levy tax merely because tractor parts were not separately named, and held the commissioner&#039;s circular inconsistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 515 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158798</link>
      <description>Parts and accessories of tractors were held not exigible to entry tax under the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, 1979 because tax liability arises only for goods expressly included in the First Schedule. The entry for machinery and its parts and accessories could not be stretched to tractors, as tractors are agricultural machinery and fall outside that entry; the Second Schedule exemption for agricultural machinery confirmed that position. The court also rejected the revenue&#039;s attempt to levy tax merely because tractor parts were not separately named, and held the commissioner&#039;s circular inconsistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>