<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 571 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158790</link>
    <description>A general exemption under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, granted by G.O. Ms. No. 604, was treated as a corresponding State exemption for section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Because the State notification operated as a general exemption and was not limited to specific conditions, the same inter-State turnovers could not be subjected to Central sales tax. The earlier binding interpretation of the State exemption was applied, and the contrary conditional-character argument was rejected. The disputed turnovers were therefore excluded from tax under the Central Act, with consequential refund or adjustment relief indicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 571 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158790</link>
      <description>A general exemption under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, granted by G.O. Ms. No. 604, was treated as a corresponding State exemption for section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Because the State notification operated as a general exemption and was not limited to specific conditions, the same inter-State turnovers could not be subjected to Central sales tax. The earlier binding interpretation of the State exemption was applied, and the contrary conditional-character argument was rejected. The disputed turnovers were therefore excluded from tax under the Central Act, with consequential refund or adjustment relief indicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>