<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 570 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158789</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions, ruling that the high alumina refractory binder and the waterproofing compound Accoproof are considered types of cement and are therefore subject to export tax as per the resolution. The court emphasized that despite different classifications for excise duty purposes, the products&#039; fundamental nature as types of cement remains unchanged for export tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 570 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158789</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions, ruling that the high alumina refractory binder and the waterproofing compound Accoproof are considered types of cement and are therefore subject to export tax as per the resolution. The court emphasized that despite different classifications for excise duty purposes, the products&#039; fundamental nature as types of cement remains unchanged for export tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>