<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 361 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158777</link>
    <description>The nature of a ship-building contract for sales tax purposes is determined by the substance of the agreement, including title, risk, payment structure, and contractual clauses, rather than by labels. Where the vessel was built for a fixed price, payments were linked to construction stages, and title and risk passed only on delivery, the agreement showed a completed sale of the finished article. Clauses on marking materials, insurance, and unused materials were treated as protective and not as transferring ownership during construction. The contracts were therefore sales and not works contracts under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the challenge to that classification failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 361 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158777</link>
      <description>The nature of a ship-building contract for sales tax purposes is determined by the substance of the agreement, including title, risk, payment structure, and contractual clauses, rather than by labels. Where the vessel was built for a fixed price, payments were linked to construction stages, and title and risk passed only on delivery, the agreement showed a completed sale of the finished article. Clauses on marking materials, insurance, and unused materials were treated as protective and not as transferring ownership during construction. The contracts were therefore sales and not works contracts under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the challenge to that classification failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>