<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 354 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158774</link>
    <description>A municipality&#039;s constitution was upheld where the State Government carved out contiguous areas from two Gram Sabhas, because the municipal provisions were broad enough to permit declaration of a notified area and alteration of limits without requiring a pre-existing self-contained unit. The levy of terminal tax was also sustained because terminal tax and entry tax are distinct levies in incidence, coverage, and constitutional source; terminal tax on import or export from a local area was not rendered invalid merely because the State had already imposed entry tax on entry of goods. The writ petition was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 354 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158774</link>
      <description>A municipality&#039;s constitution was upheld where the State Government carved out contiguous areas from two Gram Sabhas, because the municipal provisions were broad enough to permit declaration of a notified area and alteration of limits without requiring a pre-existing self-contained unit. The levy of terminal tax was also sustained because terminal tax and entry tax are distinct levies in incidence, coverage, and constitutional source; terminal tax on import or export from a local area was not rendered invalid merely because the State had already imposed entry tax on entry of goods. The writ petition was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>