<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 342 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the marketability and dutiability of the sludge/sediments under Chapter 27, setting aside the vessel&#039;s confiscation and countervailing duty imposition. Penalties on the appellant-company and its Managing Director were reduced significantly. The valuation issue was remanded for reassessment. The decision balanced legal requirements with practical considerations, affirming marketability and classification while addressing penalties and valuation concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 342 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the marketability and dutiability of the sludge/sediments under Chapter 27, setting aside the vessel&#039;s confiscation and countervailing duty imposition. Penalties on the appellant-company and its Managing Director were reduced significantly. The valuation issue was remanded for reassessment. The decision balanced legal requirements with practical considerations, affirming marketability and classification while addressing penalties and valuation concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>