<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalties due to import restrictions introduced after the goods were loaded. The Tribunal held that such post-loading restrictions cannot justify confiscation or penalties, citing legal precedents. While the customs duty was enhanced based on disputed values of goods, the Tribunal reduced redemption fines and penalties for both appellants considering the lower side of the differential duty amounts involved in the undervaluation of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalties due to import restrictions introduced after the goods were loaded. The Tribunal held that such post-loading restrictions cannot justify confiscation or penalties, citing legal precedents. While the customs duty was enhanced based on disputed values of goods, the Tribunal reduced redemption fines and penalties for both appellants considering the lower side of the differential duty amounts involved in the undervaluation of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>