<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239155</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for goods transport agency services used to move export goods from the factory to the port was treated as admissible input service credit. The Tribunal relied on earlier precedent and the Board&#039;s circular, noting that the same issue had already been decided in favour of assessees in comparable export cases. The result recorded is that the credit was allowed for export transportation, and the revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239155</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for goods transport agency services used to move export goods from the factory to the port was treated as admissible input service credit. The Tribunal relied on earlier precedent and the Board&#039;s circular, noting that the same issue had already been decided in favour of assessees in comparable export cases. The result recorded is that the credit was allowed for export transportation, and the revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>