https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239151 The Bench allowed the application for condonation of delay of 88 days in filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The responsible individuals provided detailed affidavits explaining the oversight that led to the delay, attributing it to a mistake in not filing the appeal due to non-production of the order. The Bench found the explanation satisfactory and directed the registry to accept the stay petition and appeal. This case emphasizes the importance of promptly rectifying oversights in legal proceedings and the discretion of the Bench to grant condonation of delay based on the merits of the explanation provided. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239151 The Bench allowed the application for condonation of delay of 88 days in filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The responsible individuals provided detailed affidavits explaining the oversight that led to the delay, attributing it to a mistake in not filing the appeal due to non-production of the order. The Bench found the explanation satisfactory and directed the registry to accept the stay petition and appeal. This case emphasizes the importance of promptly rectifying oversights in legal proceedings and the discretion of the Bench to grant condonation of delay based on the merits of the explanation provided. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239151